Ghost Stories

Stambovsky v. Ackley

Stambovsky v. Ackley, 169 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991), is a case in the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, that held that a house, which the owner had previously advertised to the public as haunted by ghosts, was legally haunted for the purpose of an action for rescission brought by a subsequent purchaser of the house. Because of its unique holding, the case has been frequently printed in textbooks on contracts and property law and widely taught in U.S. law school classes, and is often cited by other courts.

During the course of her ownership of the property at issue, which was located in Nyack, New York, Helen Ackley and members of her family had reported the existence of numerous poltergeists in the house. Ackley had reported the existence of ghosts in the house to both Reader’s Digest[1] and a local newspaper on three occasions between 1977 and 1989, when the house was included on a five-home walking tour of the city. She recounted to the press several instances in which the poltergeists interacted directly with members of her family. She claimed that grandchildren received “gifts” of baby rings, all of which suddenly disappeared later. She also claimed that one ghost would wake her each morning by shaking her bed. She claimed that when spring break arrived she proclaimed loudly that she did not have to wake up early and she would like to sleep in; her bed did not shake the next morning.

Neither Ackley nor her realtor, Ellis Realty, revealed the haunting to Jeffrey Stambovsky before he entered a contract to purchase the house in 1989 or 1990. Stambovsky made a $32,500 downpayment on the agreed price of $650,000 for the house.[2] Stambovsky was from New York City and was not aware of the folklore of Nyack, including the widely known haunting story.

When Stambovsky learned of the haunting story, he filed an action requesting rescission of the contract of sale and for damages for fraudulent misrepresentation by Ackley and Ellis Realty. Stambovsky did not attend the closing which caused him to forfeit the downpayment (although he was then not obligated to buy the house).[2] A New York Supreme Court (trial court) dismissed the action, and Stambovsky appealed.
The case
Majority opinion

Near the beginning of the majority opinion (three out of five justices) in its most well-known conclusion: “having reported [the ghosts'] presence in both a national publication… and the local press… defendant is estopped to deny their existence and, as a matter of law, the house is haunted.” The court noted that regardless of whether the house was truly haunted or not, the fact that the house had been widely reported as being haunted greatly affected its value.

Notwithstanding these conclusions, the court affirmed the dismissal of the fraudulent misrepresentation action and stated that the realtor was under no duty to disclose the haunting to potential buyers. Thus, no damages were available to Stambovsky because New York, at the time, adhered to property law doctrine of caveat emptor.

The appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision regarding the rescission action, however, as it went on to note that “haunting” was not a condition that a buyer or potential buyer of real property can and should be able to ascertain upon reasonable inspection of the property. According to the court, though the doctrine of caveat emptor would normally operate to bar a rescission action, causing seller to have no duty to disclose information about the property to be sold (but also preventing the seller from affirmatively misrepresenting the condition of the property), the doctrine, in a merged law and equity system, can be modified to do justice to the parties. In this case, “the most meticulous inspection and the search would not reveal the presence of poltergeists at the premises or unearth the property’s ghoulish reputation in the community,” thus equity would allow Stambovsky the remedy of contract rescission against the seller, Ackley. The court held:

Where, as here, the seller not only takes unfair advantage of the buyer’s ignorance but has created and perpetuated a condition about which he is unlikely to even inquire, enforcement of the contract (in whole or in part) is offensive to the court’s sense of equity. Application of the remedy of rescission, within the bounds of the narrow exception to the doctrine of caveat emptor set forth herein, is entirely appropriate to relieve the unwitting purchaser from the consequences of a most unnatural bargain.

The opinion makes reference to a number of popular books and films featuring ghosts, including Shakespeare’s Hamlet and the 1984 movie Ghostbusters and uses various words meaning “ghost” descriptively throughout (e.g., “in his pursuit of a legal remedy for fraudulent misrepresentation against the seller, plaintiff hasn’t a ghost of a chance”, “I am moved by the spirit of equity”, and “the notion that a haunting is a condition which can and should be ascertained upon reasonable inspection of the premises is a hobgoblin which should be exorcised from the body of legal precedent”).
Dissenting opinion

The dissenting opinion argued that the doctrine of caveat emptor should be strictly applied and would affirm the trial court’s dismissal of all of the actions. Displeased by the majority’s basis for its holding, the dissent said, “Finally, if the doctrine of caveat emptor is to be discarded, it should be for a reason more substantive than a poltergeist. The existence of a poltergeist is no more binding upon the defendants than it is upon this court.”
Epilogue

The case generated considerable publicity. Among the new prospective buyers to the house at 1 LaVeta Place on the Hudson River was Kreskin (who was interested in it because of the haunted claim).[2] Ackley sold the house to another buyer and moved to Florida in 1991. In 1993 Paranormal researchers Bill Merrill and Glenn Johnson with the aid of Helen Ackley said they claimed to have contacted the ghosts from Portland, Oregon. The ghosts were reported to have told them that it wasn’t as much fun haunting the house without Helen.[3] They wrote their findings in the book Sir George The Ghost Of Nyack.[4] Helen Ackley died in 2003. There have not been public reports of hauntings in recent years.[3]

Let me tell you some things that are true about ghosts. Actually there are only two kinds of ghosts: real and not-real.

The real ghosts are everywhere. They’re in your home, in your car, in your school, and in your dreams. Ghost researchers call these interactive ghosts. I call them soul-ghosts, or disincarnate souls. I don’t care for the term, disembodied because they do have a body. We just can’t see it for the same reason that we can’t see sound waves and ultraviolet light. They’re outside the range of our sentient boundary.

Soul-ghosts are interactive. They reach out to you, and you feel no fear … absolutely none. They envelop you in a blanket of warm fuzzies. Real ghosts can be mistaken for angels. This isn’t a paranormal experience. It’s a supernatural and spiritual experience.

The not-real ghosts seem to be everywhere too, but only for people that believe they exist, or at least believe that they might exist. They rarely bother unbelievers. Ghost researchers call the not-real ghosts … residual ghosts. These ghosts seem to defy the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy because they pop in and out of existence like virtual particles. The appearance of this type of ghost can be explained by quantum physics. From the Copenhagen Interpretation, which states that nothing is real until you look at it, to the holographic theory of the universe, all ghosts abide by the laws of quantum physics.

People that experience residual ghosts say that they seem to be caught in a time-loop replaying the same scene over and over. The above mentioned physics also apply to residual ghosts but with the addition of Schrodinger’s equations. For every “now” that we experience, a positive wave flows into the future and a negative wave flows into the past like concentric ripples created by a rock thrown into a pond.

The fact that some people experience residual ghosts is due to normal functions of human consciousness. Although some might rather think of it as a “glitch.” Residual ghosts are unusual and fascinating experiences with natural causes.

Briefly, a few more types of not-real ghosts are poltergeists, demons, and shadow people. Abnormal psychology applies to poltergeists and demons. The physiology of the eye accounts for shadow people.

So, what’s the truth about ghosts? Do they exist? Yes, of course they do. Can the scientific method be used to investigate them? Yes, they use measurable amounts of energy. Can you record their voices and photograph ghosts? Yes, but one needs to be alert to pattern recognition tendencies.

The science of ghost investigation has the potential to make a huge difference in a society still tormented by superstition and fear. You have the equipment. You have the rationale. And you have the compassionate desire to help others.

by Robin Renee Bridges
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

35 thoughts on “Ghost Stories

  1. The root of your writing whilst appearing reasonable at first, did not really work well with me after some time. Someplace throughout the sentences you were able to make me a believer unfortunately only for a while. I however have a problem with your jumps in logic and one would do nicely to fill in those gaps. When you can accomplish that, I would certainly end up being fascinated.

  2. This is a good posting, I was wondering if I could use this write-up on my website, I will link it back to your website though. If this is a problem please let me know and I will take it down right away

  3. I needed to write you that tiny remark just to thank you very much once again for those gorgeous thoughts you’ve shown on this site. It has been particularly open-handed with you to provide without restraint what exactly a lot of people could have sold as an e book to help make some profit for themselves, especially considering that you might have done it if you decided. These concepts additionally worked to be a good way to know that some people have the identical fervor the same as mine to know the truth a good deal more concerning this issue. I am sure there are millions of more pleasant occasions up front for individuals who start reading your website.

  4. What are you stating, man? I recognize everyones got their own opinion, but really? Listen, your website is interesting. I like the energy you put into it, specifically with the vids and the pics. But, come on. Theres gotta be a better way to say this, a way that doesnt make it seem like most people here is stupid!

  5. One of the more impressive blogs Ive seen. Thanks so much for keeping the internet classy for a change. Youve got style, class, bravado. I mean it. Please keep it up because without the internet is definitely lacking in intelligence.

  6. What are you saying, man? I understand everyones got their own viewpoint, but really? Listen, your web log is awesome. I like the effort you put into it, specifically with the vids and the pics. But, come on. Theres gotta be a better way to say this, a way that doesnt make it seem like most people here is stupid!

  7. Needed to write you one bit of note to thank you so much again for your remarkable pointers you have documented in this case. This is so tremendously generous with you to allow freely exactly what some people could have marketed for an electronic book in order to make some bucks for their own end, principally considering the fact that you could possibly have tried it in case you considered necessary. Those principles also acted to provide a great way to fully grasp other individuals have a similar eagerness really like my own to learn good deal more when considering this condition. I believe there are lots of more enjoyable periods ahead for many who examine your blog post.

  8. Hello – I must say, I’m impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs and information was very easy to access. I found what I wanted in no time at all. Pretty awesome. Would appreciate it if you add forums or something, it would be a perfect way for your clients to interact. Great job

  9. I have viewed that intelligent real estate agents everywhere you go are getting set to FSBO Promoting. They are noticing that it’s not only placing a sign post in the front place. It’s really with regards to building relationships with these vendors who at some point will become buyers. So, after you give your time and efforts to aiding these traders go it alone – the “Law associated with Reciprocity” kicks in. Thanks for your blog post.

  10. What i don’t realize is in reality how you are now not really a lot more smartly-appreciated than you might be now. You are so intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this topic, made me in my opinion consider it from numerous various angles. Its like women and men are not interested except it is one thing to do with Woman gaga! Your own stuffs nice. At all times take care of it up!

  11. Youre so awesome, man! I cant believe I missed this blog for so long. Its just great stuff all round. Your design, man…too amazing! I cant wait to read what youve got next. I love everything that youre saying and want more, more, MORE! Keep this up, man! Its just too good.

  12. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will talk about this site with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

  13. You…are…my…hero!!! I cant believe something like this exists on the internet! Its so true, so honest, and more than that you dont sound like an idiot! Finally, someone who knows how to talk about a subject without sounding like a kid who didnt get that bike he wanted for Christmas.

  14. Generally I do not learn post on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me to take a look at and do so! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, quite great article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>